Study Examines the Effectiveness of Skin Barriers that Protect Clinicians from Skin Irritation Due to Prolonged Mask Use

Clinicians suffering skin damage and breakdown caused by extended mask use throughout the pandemic, now commonly referred to as “maskne,” prompted the largest study to date of various skin barriers and examined seal integrity with quantitative fit testing (QNFT).

Many clinicians are wearing and reusing their own personal protective equipment (PPE), like the N95 and 3M half-face mask respirators, across multiple shifts due to PPE shortages. As a result, clinicians are experiencing skin irritation, inflammation, breakdown, and ulcerations due to protracted use of N95s.

Under the guidance of Daniel S. Morrison, MD, associate professor of emergency medicine at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, the student led study, published in the May edition of the Journal of Hospital Infection, examined whether the placement of a silicone scar sheet (ScarAway®), Cavilon™, or Tegaderm™ affects 3M™ half-face mask respirator barrier integrity when compared to no barrier using QNFT. 3M half-mask respirators were chosen because they were already being used by clinicians, are reusable, and are readily available. Nine clinicians were enrolled, including physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and technicians.

All volunteers served as their own control as they were tested using their own 3M half-face mask respirator, with and without each skin barrier. Participants were also instructed to apply the supplied dressing on their nasal bridge. No further instruction was given to the participant regarding the placement of the dressing. The study aimed to see the effects of the dressings as they would be commonly placed and used with masks in clinical use.

Results showed that Cavilon did not compromise the seal like the silicone scar sheet or Tegaderm.

“These results will inform future research and hospital policies about the safest barriers to prevent skin breakdown without compromising on the safety of our providers and patients in this pandemic,” said Morrison.

Investigators recommend that clinicians be appropriately fit tested in a quantitative manner and encourage specialists in the field of dermatology, infectious disease, and occupational safety, to collaborate further to ensure healthcare workers feel safe and comfortable when treating COVID-19 patients and other airborne diseases in the coming months and in future pandemics.

Source: Rutgers University-New Brunswick

1 Comment on "Study Examines the Effectiveness of Skin Barriers that Protect Clinicians from Skin Irritation Due to Prolonged Mask Use"

  1. 190755 459984Greetings! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I genuinely enjoy reading via your blog posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with exactly the same topics? Thank you so much! 32649

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.