Striving for Continuous Improvement
By David Potack
This column originally appeared in the January 2020 issue of Healthcare Hygiene magazine.
America’s advanced capability to control infection contributes to our nation’s standard of living. We assert that we prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) better than the rest of the world and conclude that maintaining such performance requires the adoption of American hygiene standards based purely on U.S. research. But this does not consider risk minimization practices superior to our own developed elsewhere, with healthcare textile (HCT) hygiene as an example.
Hospital linen is insignificant to HAIs and probably always will be. Based on the two cases in the U.S. reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the 2000s, CDC statistics indicate the chance that an American won’t wake up tomorrow because her/his bed suffocated and strangled the individual to death is 77 times greater than the chance that a U.S. hospital patient will be affected by an HAI transmitted by bed linen.
No matter how small an infection risk may be, however, it’s critical to minimize it. For more than 30 years, the German Certification Association for Professional Textile Services (CAPTS) has established thresholds for HCT cleanliness. Since the 1986 launch of CAPTS’ RAL-GZ 992/2 certification in Germany, the designation has been earned by laundries in 15 other European countries (Eastern and Western), China, Japan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
TRSA’s inception of Hygienically Clean Healthcare certification introduced CAPTS cleanliness standards to North America in 2012 as an adjunct to robust laundry inspection. Some 150 laundries in the United States, Canada and Mexico have either been certified or have applied for Hygienically Clean. It has become the American microbiological content standard for HCTs.
Europeans have long been ahead of North America in adopting laundry technologies and measures. Tunnel washing was invented in Germany in 1965; with its superior water and energy efficiency and requiring less manual material handling than standalone washers, it was embraced in Europe first. Over the years, visits by North American TRSA members to our overseas counterparts have been invaluable. Now when we tour their laundries, we still see technical advances, but we use essentially the same types of equipment and supplies. This striking similarity validates the adaptation of CAPTS thresholds here.
Calls for U.S. research on HCT cleanliness thresholds overlook the Hygienically Clean certification track record. Certified laundry facilities have tested over 5,500 textile samples using the same or similar protocols and microbiological levels that have been examined, researched, tested and discussed with our global partners for many years.
While sentiment is expressed that an industry benchmark still has not been established, the Hygienically Clean thresholds—on total microbial content (20 colony forming units per square decimeter of fabric in the RODAC plate test), yeast and mold (same) and absence of specified bacteria—have thrived overseas for decades and been accepted by North American healthcare facilities for nearly a decade.
Suggesting other U.S. thresholds are needed could backfire and prompt government rulemaking rather than the stringent self-regulation Hygienically Clean provides. Today in Germany, the Ministry of Health’s Robert Koch-Institute (RKI) sets basic rules for healthcare products and procedures to reduce infection risk in hospitals, including limit values for HCT processing. Microbiological requirements are enforced for hospital linen, hospital laundries, laundry processes and outsourcing to private laundries. Building requirements and recommended procedures and performances are given or referenced.
On a continent-wide level, the European Union standard (EN 14065) on risk analysis and bio-contamination control encourages self-regulation. It fosters a standardized quality management system for RABC for laundries in sensitive sectors including healthcare, food processing, pharmaceutical and medical devices, but isn’t overly prescriptive. Used by most major European healthcare laundry firms, EN 14065 is voluntary, but it guides regulatory, accreditation and certification authorities.
Laundry reflects the positive influence on the U.S. of the worldwide development of international health technology. According to Medical Product Outsourcing magazine 2019 listing of the top global medical device companies, nine of the Top 20 are based outside the United States: seven in Europe and two in Japan.
Europe’s hygiene performance could be considered more successful than ours. Every other year, the World Economic Forum publishes a report that provides a valuable tool for policymakers, companies and complementary sectors to understand and anticipate emerging trends and risks in global travel and tourism. A competitiveness index rates countries on their enabling environment, policy and enabling conditions, infrastructure and natural and cultural resources.
Health and hygiene are pillars in the rating of a nation’s enabling environment. Among the 140 countries, the U.S. is 51st in this category and Canada is 52nd. All European nations (except six) and nine non-European rank higher. Austria and Germany are tied for first. Their rating is 20 percent stronger than that of the U.S. Argentina (14), Japan (16), and the Republic of Korea (17) all are 10 percent better.
Continuous improvement is our goal. With our worldwide counterparts, we anticipate further reducing the already infinitesimal risk of spreading pathogens through HCTs.
David Potack is president of Unitex, a family-owned medical linen and uniform provider. He is the immediate past chairman of TRSA. He currently chairs the board of trustees of Montefiore St. Luke’s Cornwall Hospital and serves on the Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital Council.
Overlooking the Obvious
By John Scherberger, FAHE
This column originally appeared in the December 2019 issue of Healthcare Hygiene magazine.
When the familiar becomes commonplace, it becomes overlooked until it becomes a movement.
The commonplace in healthcare facilities is healthcare textiles (HCTs). The overlooked in healthcare facilities is healthcare textiles. The movement in healthcare facilities is HCTs.
Why is this a movement?
The movement may begin as a result of real concern on the part of healthcare workers. It may be the result of increased scrutiny by infection preventionists and environmental services directors. Faulty extrapolation of information or disinformation has been the cause of some movements. It may be the reaction to not fully understanding that maintaining hygienic textiles is everyone's responsibility.
It is true that some patients have become unwell and even died due to pathogens traced to healthcare textiles. Illness and death are nothing to trivialize. No person is just a number, a statistic, or inconsequential, mainly if that person is a loved one or a friend.
However, the instances of an HCT being a fomite is minuscule, and as widespread as some studies may lead one to believe. This observation is in no way meant to minimize the possibility or the results of HCT being fomites; it is just a fact.
In June 2015, a study by Lynne M. Sehulster, PhD, M(ASCP), titled “Healthcare Laundry and Textiles in the United States: Review and Commentary on Contemporary Infection Prevention Issues,” was published in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. The study was a retrospective review of outbreaks of infectious diseases associated with laundered, reusable HCTs, primarily in North America, Europe, and Japan. Of the 12 reported instances, they appeared over the past 43 years and involved nearly 350 patients.
Before the reader reaches inaccurate conclusions, one must recognize that, in the United States alone, in 1989, healthcare facilities had over five billion pounds of healthcare textiles are processed. The 2019 estimates are to expect closer to 10 billion pounds. Hard to visualize? How about stacking the Pentagon on to itself five times? Or a pile the height of 22 Willis Tower (a.k.a. Sears Tower) in Chicago.
In her 2015 retrospective study, Sehulster reported:
- Of the 12 outbreaks, 4 (33 percent) reported problems with laundered textile storage in the hospital;
- 7 (58 percent) reported contaminated washing equipment, inappropriate wash cycle or water temperature settings, or recycled water issues;
- 1 (8 percent) attributed the outbreak to inadvertent contamination occurring during transit from the laundry to the hospital.
What are all these findings saying to infection preventionists and environmental services directors about their healthcare textiles?
Very clearly, mitigation of infections from HCTs is possible by closer attention to processes both in the healthcare laundry facility and the healthcare facility.
But how? How can infection preventionists, environmental services, and laundry experts ensure that HCTs received from healthcare laundries are hygienic? What are they to do to maintain the sanitary status of the HCTs once introduced into a healthcare facility? How can those entrusted with providing hygienic products to patients earn the trust of patients and healthcare workers?
Healthcare textiles are the one product provided to patients, and many healthcare workers, that are so ubiquitous they are conceded as being appropriate, i.e., "safe" and hygienic, for use by everyone. Right? However, that concession is without its limitations. The limitations are dependent upon processes being in place; in the healthcare laundry and the healthcare facility. Not only must they be in place, but strict adherence is also necessary.
IPs understand there are six points at which a chain of infection chain is susceptible to disruption. When a link in the chain is severed, germs have a lower potential from becoming a pathogen to a vulnerable person.
As a reminder, the six links include the infectious agent, reservoir, portal of exit, mode of transmission, portal of entry, and susceptible host. The Association for Professionals in Infection Prevention and Epidemiology (APIC) has a compelling and illustrative infographic on breaking the chain of infection: http://professionals.site.apic.org/files/2016/09/Break-the-Chain-of-Infection.pdf
So, how do IPs who are not healthcare laundry experts assure themselves that they have broken a link, or links, in the chain? How can IPs and EVS know what processes and procedures are necessary for a healthcare laundry to provide hygienic HCTs? What procedures are necessary for a healthcare facility to maintain the hygienic integrity of the HCT received from the healthcare laundry?
The first step is ensuring the healthcare facility has adopted and implemented a linen laundry processing policy. By the way, California has mandated that healthcare facilities have linen laundry processing policies in place by Jan. 1, 2020. Further, they stipulate "the facility's linen laundry is required to be processed in compliance with the facility's updated linen laundry processing policy, and CDC and CMS standards."
The Assembly Bill indicates that the healthcare facility must incorporate their contractor's linen and laundry processes into their policy facility policy. How? By stating that their laundry and linen services (contractor or on-premises laundry) have processes and procedures that adhere to CDC guidelines and or CMS regulations/F-tags and referencing the contractor and methods in their policy. Perhaps the easiest way to ensure this is to require the laundry facility to be HLAC-accredited. Although specific to California, the requirement contained in the Assembly Bill should be the in-place standard for all healthcare facilities throughout the United States and Canada. It leaves nothing to chance, speculation, or presumption.
Although not mandated by any regulatory agency, IPs are encouraged by APIC and many other professional organizations to visit the healthcare laundry at least annually. Keeping in mind that a lot can happen over a year, a better suggestion is to visit -- unannounced -- at least quarterly. Knowing what to look for during the visit, a more appropriate term would be inspection, may be daunting, but should not be off-putting or intimidating. The Healthcare Laundry Accreditation Council (HLACnet.org) makes available at no cost on their website a checklist that IPs can become familiar with and use during inspections regardless of the laundry's accreditation or certification status.
Don't expect to find a clean-room environment; after all, a healthcare laundry is a production facility that uses large, state-of-the-art equipment, water, and steam lines throughout the facility, as well as fans and electrical conduit. It will be necessarily a manufacturing facility where professionals take dirty, stained, contaminated healthcare laundry products and turn them into sanitary textiles. Laundering on such a large scale requires following standardized processes and procedures meticulously.
The more often the IP visits the healthcare laundry contractor, the more information and understanding of how their job requires regular visits. Visits and knowledge will also improve communication, cooperation, and collaboration in meeting the needs of the healthcare facility and the contractor.
Regardless of the excellence of a healthcare laundry, if a hospital or healthcare facility fails to receive, transport, store, and distribute the HCTs in ways that will maintain the integrity of the textiles, all will be for naught.
People are prone to believe "it's the other guy" that spreads germs and fails to follow the rules, regulations, and guidelines. "It's the other guy" that doesn't wash their hands before encountering hygienic HCT's. "It's the other guy" that carries the clean textiles against their uniform or scrubs and picks up textiles that have fallen to a floor and uses them for patient care. "It's the other guy, not me," that sneezes onto clean textiles or sneezes or coughs into the crook of their arm then gathers HCTs into the same contaminated arm or uniform. "It's the other guy" that wipes sweat from their brow or face and unconsciously puts the contaminated washcloth or hand towel into a patient room for use. And "It's the other guy" that brings an excess of HCTs into a patient room and leaves them on an unclean counter and used for the newly arriving patient. The reality is that everyone is "the other guy."
When the healthcare textile becomes so commonplace that it becomes overlooked and taken for granted, harm may occur to patients and staff. When taken for granted, things may no longer be valued; thus, the laying of a foundation for injury.
Laundry and linen processing must be valued. Healthcare facilities must elevate the value and importance of transporting, handling, storage, and distribution of hygienic HCTs, if for no other reason that the benefit of patients.
John Scherberger, FAHE is the owner of Healthcare Risk Mitigation in Spartanburg, S.C. He is a subject matter expert in healthcare environmental services, healthcare linen and laundry operations, and infection prevention.
Defining and Measuring ‘Hygienically Clean’
By Carol McLay, DrPH, MPH, RN, CIC, FAPIC
This column originally appeared in the November 2019 issue of Healthcare Hygiene magazine.
Laundry services play a critical role in a healthcare facility’s infection prevention and control program. Healthcare textiles (HCTs) include bed sheets, pillowcases, blankets, towels, personal clothing, patient apparel, employee uniforms, scrub suits, gowns, and drapes for surgical procedures. Contaminated textiles often contain large numbers of microorganisms from body substances such as blood, skin, stool, urine, vomitus, and other body tissues and fluids, and it is important to ensure that pathogens are not transferred to patients or healthcare workers.
In addition to normal microbial skin flora, organisms commonly found on HCTs include gram-negative bacteria, coagulase negative staphylococci, and Bacillus species.1 These organisms have the ability to bind to textiles and may survive for as long as 90 days.2-3 Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in particular have high ratios of binding (80 percent) to polyester or acrylic fibers. Nylon fibers bind S. aureus at low ratios, but P. aeruginosa at intermediate ratios. The binding rate for cotton fibers was reported to be less than 10 percent.4
In addition to bacteria, molds and viruses including rotavirus and parainfluenza virus have been cultured from hospital textiles.1
HCTs have been implicated in hospital outbreaks of fungal and bacterial pathogens; 12 such outbreaks have been reported worldwide in the past 43 years affecting 350 patients.5
Investigators have examined the connection between healthcare textiles and infectious disease outbreaks and their conclusions emphasize that fact that correct laundering of healthcare textiles is an important measure for preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Through a combination of soil removal, pathogen removal, and pathogen inactivation, contaminated laundry can be rendered hygienically clean.
Hygienically clean is defined by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) as “free of pathogens in sufficient numbers to cause human illness.”6 However, AAMI does not quantitatively define the meaning of “sufficient numbers.”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also does not provide a quantitative value for hygienically clean textiles in their “Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control In Health-Care Facilities” but do state that proper laundering processes should result in a 3-4 log10 reduction (approximately 99 percent) of microorganisms.7-9 A postprocess level of 10-100 colony-forming units (CFUs) has been suggested.5
The CDC does not currently recommend routine microbiologic sampling of clean textiles, however, sampling during outbreak investigations is appropriate if epidemiologic evidence indicates a role for healthcare textiles and clothing in disease transmission.8
Microbiological testing of laundered textiles is conducted routinely in Europe and Australia as a requirement of their healthcare regulation programs.10-11 The Certification Association for Professional Textiles Services Administration (CAPSTA), which has 400 members in 15 European countries, Japan, China, and the United Arab Emirates, has established safe microbial levels for laundered textiles as 20 CFU per square decimeter (PSD). This microbial threshold has also been adopted by the European Union.
In the United States, microbial levels on hygienically clean textiles have not been reliably measured. To address this gap, Sands, et al. (2019) collected 48 healthcare textile samples from hygienically clean linen on three different patient care units at two separate points in time.12 The researchers reported that only 27 percent of the samples had a total aerobic microbial count below the expected 100 CFU level; the values ranged between 9 and 40,000 CFUs. For yeast and mold counts, more than 81 percent had counts of 100 CFUs or less. Interestingly, the overall average aerobic bacterial, yeast, and mold counts was lower after 24 hours of storage on the patient care units compared to the time of delivery. The authors theorize that the textiles may have been slightly damp, then were folded and placed in plastic carts for delivery allowing microorganisms to proliferate. The textiles would then have had time to dry before the second sample was obtained.
Microbial testing of textiles is a component of the Healthcare Laundry Accreditation Council (HLAC)’s recently introduced Laundry Process Monitoring ToolKit, which validates the effectiveness of a laundry’s processes by measuring the number of microorganisms found in a laundry on hard surfaces, in the air, on linen, in the water and on employee hands.
HLAC is a nonprofit organization that inspects and accredits laundries that process reusable textiles for hospitals, nursing homes and other healthcare facilities. HLAC’s core purpose is to establish and maintain criteria and procedures for accreditation. The HLAC Accreditation Standards are established as the minimum acceptable practice for the preparation of hygienically clean, reusable healthcare textiles for patient care, implemented and executed by accredited laundry facilities processing reusable healthcare textiles.13 The standards incorporate evidence-based, peer-reviewed best practices and recommendations for infection prevention and laundry procedures from federal agencies (e.g., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)) and professional entities such as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Facilities Guidelines Institute (FGI), and the Textile Rental Services Association of America (TRSA).
The five specific testing areas that compose HLAC’s process monitoring toolkit include:
- Surface sampling analysis: Monitoring surface cleanliness prevents contamination of clean products that contact surfaces during finishing, transporting, packaging and storing.
- Air sampling analysis: Air sampling analysis provides Total Aerobic Microbial Counts (TAMC).
- Linen analysis: Bioburden testing provides microbial contamination counts measuring the textile provider’s ability to achieve and maintain a state of cleanliness in their products. Products sampled are cotton, polyester and blends, representative of the highest volume materials being processed.
- Water analysis: Water sampling enables the laundry to identify specific areas of concern such as points of suspected contamination, or to determine if a problem has been corrected.
- Hand hygiene analysis: Practicing hand hygiene is an effective way to prevent cross-contamination and infection. This test is designed to measure handwashing practices, not individuals. Samples are blind-coded to assure the anonymity of participants. Testing includes pre- and post-wash; a glove test; and a swab test.
Data from these tests enable laundries to adjust their processes to improve overall plant hygiene, which helps to ensure the safety of the HCTs that contact hospital patients.
Microbial testing of textiles is also a component of TRSA’s “Hygienically Clean Certification” program, which requires third-party, quantified biological testing and inspection.14 Hygienically Clean Healthcare certified laundries use processes, chemicals and best management practices acknowledged by the CDC, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, American National Standards Institute and others.
Testing is performed using United States Pharmacopeia (USP) 62 (Microbial Enumeration of Nonsterile Products) criterion, which necessitates the complete absence of specified microorganisms, including S. aureus, P.aeruginosa, and E. coli. The Pass/Fail criterion is 0 CFU per square decimeter (PSD). The protocol also includes the Replicate Organism Detection And Counting (RODAC) microbiological test to determine the total amount of micro-organisms (less than or equal to 20 CFU PSD).
Laundries pass three rounds of outcome-based microbial testing. To maintain certification, laundry plants must pass quarterly testing to ensure that as laundry conditions change, such as water quality, textile fabric composition and wash chemistry, laundered product quality is consistently maintained.
Healthcare associated infections resulting from contaminated linen are increasingly being recognized in the literature and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Healthcare safety, including the prevention and reduction of healthcare-associated infections is a national priority. To date there has been a lack of validated measures to assess the effectiveness of processes in healthcare laundries that ensure the cleanliness of textiles.
Quantifying microbial levels on the textiles will support evidence-based practices by enabling identification of contamination sources, key control points in the process and provide recommendations for facility specific microbiological process monitoring as it relates to infection prevention. Healthcare laundries strive to maintain the highest standards of infection prevention and to provide their healthcare customers hygienically clean linen and are an integral component of the multidisciplinary team approach necessary to improve patient outcomes.
- Fijan S, Turk SS. Hospital textiles, are they a possible vehicle for healthcare-associated infections? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2012 September; 9(9):3330-3343.
- Neely AN, Maley MP. Survival of enterococci and staphylococci on hospital fabrics and plastic. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:724-6.
- Neely AN, Orloff MM. Survival of some medically important fungi on hospital fabrics and plastics. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:3360-1.
- Takashima M, Shirai F, Sageshima M, Ikeda N, Okamoto Y, Dohi Y. Distinctive bacterial-binding property of cloth materials. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:27-30.
- Sehulster LM. Healthcare laundry and textiles in the United States: review and commentary on contemporary infection prevention issues. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:1073-88.
- Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Processing of reusable surgical textiles for use in health care facilities. 2000. ANSI/AAMI ST65:2000.
- Blaser MJ, Smith PE, Cody HJ, Wang WL, LaForce FM. Killing of fabric associated bacteria in hospital laundry by low-temperature washing. J Infect Dis 1984;149:48-57.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/environmental-guidelines-P.pdf. 9. Jaska JM, Fredell DL. Impact of detergent systems on bacterial survival on laundered fabrics. Appl Environ Microbiol 1980;39:743-8.
- German Certification Association for Professional Textile Services. RAL-GZ992/2–Hospital Linen. Bőnnigheim, Germany. Available at: http://www.waeschereien.de/en/waeschereien/guetezeichen/9922_healthcare_linen/9922_healthcare_linen.html.
- Institute for Sustainability and Hygiene International. Certification standards for processing reusable linen. (2011). MacKenzie, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Sands, F, Fairbanks L. How clean is "hygienically clean": Quantitative microbial levels from samples of clean healt care textiles across the United States. Am J Infect Control. 2019 May;47(5):509-514.
- Healthcare Laundry Accreditation Council (HLAC). Accreditation Standards for Processing Reusable Textiles for Use in Healthcare Facilities, 2016. Available at: https://www.hlacnet.org/standards-documents.
- Textile Rental Services Association of America (TRSA). Standard for producing hygienically clean reusable textiles, 2018. Available at: http://hygienicallyclean.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Standard-for-Producing-Hygienically-Clean-Reusable-Textiles-Healthcare-03012018.pdf.
The Modern Healthcare Laundry Will Shoot for the Moon
By Gregory Gicewicz
This column was originally published in the October 2019 issue of Healthcare Hygiene magazine.
This past July marked the 50th anniversary of the first humans landing on the moon as part of NASA’s Apollo lunar mission. Now, NASA is going back to the moon, but it’s not doing it alone. Last May, after a vetting process, the space agency announced its commercial partners in the first phase of its Artemis program to deliver cargo and scientific instruments to the lunar surface in the next few years to support human landings and habitation by the mid-2020s.
In choosing its partners, a NASA spokesperson said, “The companies we have selected represent a diverse community of exciting small American companies, each with their own unique, innovative approach to getting to the Moon.”
I can relate to this, though I’m certainly not in the aerospace industry. Rather, I’m the owner/operator of a healthcare laundry in the greater Seattle area. As such, my company partners with more than 30 acute-care hospitals and surgical centers to annually deliver 10 million pounds of processed, hygienically safe reusable healthcare textiles (HCTs).
Just as NASA has realized through its Artemis program that getting to the moon is no longer a do-it-alone mission, leading hospitals have recognized the role that partners have in their respective successes. And nowhere is this more evident than in their mission to eradicate themselves from the reality of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), a situation that has reached epidemic proportions.
Where once the selection of a healthcare laundry was a mere decision of choosing the lowest-cost provider, responsible hospitals are now carefully vetting their laundries. What are the laundry’s standards for ensuring infection prevention and patient safety? Do their standards cover the complete textile-processing cycle: from handling and transporting soiled healthcare textiles, to in-plant processing and delivery back to the customer? Do their standards include strict adherence to federal government regulations and guidelines?
A Giant Leap for Healthcare Laundry?
And what about innovation? Indeed, in today’s marketplace, the modern healthcare laundry must be able to demonstrate how it has evolved to better align innovation with a hospital’s infection prevention strategy.
A case in point: innovation in process monitoring. Process monitoring refers to how laundry operators can continually know how well their processes are performing and whether their standards are on target as originally intended.
It used to be that a laundry would establish a baseline of processing standards, followed by documented staff training, and finally proof that the policy was being executed. Monitoring was typically provided in the form of checklists or visual cues, e.g., the carts look clean √; the surfaces look clean √; the hands look clean √; the air looks clean √; the linen looks clean √. The obvious flaw here is that there has never been a way to measure these “checks” with quantifiable data.
That is, until now. A recently introduced innovation in laundry testing and process analysis is enabling laundry operators to recover the most accurate representation of viable organisms (bioburden) on healthcare textiles; and quantifying the sources of potential environmental contamination on textiles that are known to come from air, hands, hard surfaces and in water systems.
Here’s a closer look at the five specific testing areas that compose this next generation of process monitoring:
• Surface sampling analysis: Monitoring surface cleanliness prevents contamination of clean products that contact surfaces during finishing, transporting, packaging and storing.
• Air sampling analysis: Air sampling analysis provides Total Aerobic Microbial Counts (TAMC), or what airborne bacterial contaminants are present in the environment.
• Linen analysis: Bioburden testing provides microbial contamination counts measuring the textile provider’s ability to achieve and maintain a state of cleanliness in their products. Products sampled are cotton, polyester and blends, representative of the highest volume materials being processed.
• Water analysis: Water sampling enables the laundry to identify specific areas of concern such as points of suspected contamination, or to determine if a problem has been corrected.
• Hand hygiene analysis: Practicing hand hygiene is an effective way to prevent cross-contamination and infection. This test is designed to measure handwashing practices, not individuals. Samples are blind-coded to assure the anonymity of participants. Testing includes pre- and post-wash; a glove test; and a swab test.
The high-level of data that come from these tests enable the laundry to adjust accordingly its processes to improve overall plant hygiene, which therefore helps to ensure the ultimate safety of those HCTs that end up in contact with hospital patients. This includes data for:
• Evaluating before and after conditions of cleaning processes
• Isolating problem areas
• Measuring the effects of process modifications and/or system improvements
• Trending over time (e.g., reasons for process variability) for determining process consistency and identifying opportunities for improvements.
I served on a team that helped in the development of this new approach and I can attest to the fact that it’s vastly different in scale from anything else currently available in the industry. It’s a “giant leap,” if you will, that enables operators to demonstrate to their healthcare partners their commitment to quality and patient safety.
If you consider yourself a modern healthcare laundry, maybe you should be shooting for the moon.
Gregory Gicewicz is president of Sterile Surgical Systems. He is past president of the Healthcare Laundry Accreditation Council (HLAC), currently serves as HLAC inspection committee chair, and led a committee that developed the HLAC Laundry Process Monitoring Toolkit.